CO129-440 - Others & Individuals - 1916 — Page 41

Further legislation is passed

(I do not

last proviso

of the

How was

can agree when the Gov's

21st July expressly

Dealing with

to read

to this

Proclamation

Legislation may

states

that all

to enemies

Statute

from references

substituted references for

the Enemy

where

vit

By laws

(4) Goods wh.

are

the property of

the

warrant

we

au thorises

the forfeiture.

not quite clear

authorizes.

this

Reg

established

in Allied territory must be forfeited Council for the counting consented

feited in army

Count of

whom foods can only

I take it by some it is hardly from the

of a foreign counting,

authorizing

the decisions of a

*Presumably

law.

the Consul

forfeitures).

should

to

count of

what

attaching to

ETD, mean

is the the Count for

wh this letter

In 59039

>

the Customs raid

this

into

the

laws

the enemy

does not refer

that

any goods

in

imported contravention of trading with

irrespective of ownership

country in

relating

to

are

raised

but thing

do

not

say

about forfeiture

anything

that before we

and

to give instructions

I think

a position

Govt.

them

and

do

;

2

Ind

4.Kong we should

to the

have

(a) ask

Customs

what they

said

in

to than

two things wh

roting of this

letter

whether

John having regard to

in 57037

as to U.K. practice

(b) send

ETD

a copy of there

Proclamation of

to in ma

muninte

the

copy

And a

whether

cannot

and

also

Raat

plain statement

do not the

List

Gov's July referred

Page 363

quote

why we

it's substance!

the face of the

which

it

contains

the forfeiture procedure

obtained from, the

that

there

make

wh

affiliates

to

foods

Can

destined

for

Equally well to goods

obtained from

Patuloy

follows

legislation

merely

& point out

N. M. 'S

be affiliated

destined Bou

without any further that this Proclamation Proclamation of the 23th May

29/12/16

Cust

I hardly think it is worth while to trouble the Customs farther.

read Exaily

The H.K. ordinance

is

the Same in form as the last & the Customs practice would not thereby be conclusive. moreover the question Whether 5.11. gordin amre 22 of 1ges

is applicable to Statuton, hist firms is one for Mr Local Counts of the Local fort. is Satisfied that the Comiti will hold the Section to be. applicable don't see that